Multiple reports this week revealed that General Motors is cutting hundreds of jobs in its IT department—but not with the intent to replace them outright with AI. The layoffs are reportedly impacting about 600 employees, or about 10% of the IT team, and the job cuts are partly designed to allow the company to bring on new employees with specific AI skills. 

General Motors has confirmed the layoffs and suggested they were part of a broader change to its IT operations. “GM is transforming its Information Technology organization to better position the company for the future,” a company spokesperson said in a statement. “As part of that work, we have made the difficult decision to eliminate certain roles globally. We are grateful for the contributions of the employees affected and are committed to supporting them through this transition.” 

According to a TechCrunch report, General Motors is still hiring IT employees, but only those with the type of skills that would allow them to actually build AI systems rather than simply having the ability to use AI to be more productive.

These layoffs are not exactly unprecedented: Over 200 salaried employees at General Motors were laid off in the fall, along with about a thousand cuts to software jobs back in 2024. (A round of sweeping job cuts last year also affected thousands of factory workers.) Each week, yet another company justifies layoffs by citing AI, as tech companies sink endless resources into shoring up their AI investments. Coinbase, Cloudflare, and PayPal all just announced job cuts and at least partly attributed them to AI. 

General Motors, for its part, has said little about why these layoffs were necessary, unlike the myriad employers who now explicitly reference AI. In a CNBC report, General Motors employees claimed they were notified about the job losses through a scripted video meeting with HR and were not given the opportunity to ask questions. But this round of layoffs appears to be another example of what AI-related job cuts may look like going forward: not simply slashing headcount due to productivity gains with AI, but also dismissing workers in favor of “AI natives” or employees with a particular skill set—and offering little explanation as that kind of disruption become increasingly common.

Pro-Russian accounts are claiming that Sergeant Bin Chen and Corporal Axel Delplanque “vanished” in Odesa, Ukraine, during an underwater mission. While it is true that these two French service members recently lost their lives, the circumstances of their deaths have no connection to any Russian attack.

Does the high price of gas have you considering a hybrid for your next vehicle? We don’t blame you, especially if you drive a lot. Fortunately, there are lots of hybrids to choose from, and many don’t cost much more than their non-hybrid counterparts. But to recoup the extra cost of a hybrid the quickest and start saving money, we don’t recommend purchasing just any hybrid. The car experts at Edmunds outline four tips that will give you the tools you need to find a hybrid that will maximize your savings.

Aim for hybrids with the shortest payback periods

New hybrids typically cost more than similar gas-only vehicles, so aim for a hybrid that doesn’t cost much more than its non-hybrid sibling. With this strategy, you will offset the price difference more quickly with the fuel savings a hybrid provides. For example, the SE hybrid version of the 2026 Hyundai Santa Fe, which is one of Hyundai’s three-row SUVs, costs just $1,350 more than the regular Santa Fe. According to the EPA, the hybrid version can save you $850 a year in fuel costs compared to the regular Santa Fe if you drive 15,000 miles a year. So, depending on how much you drive, the fuel savings could cover the extra cost in less than two years.

The Ford Maverick, which is Ford’s compact pickup, and the Lexus NX small luxury SUV are two other models that will pay you back quicker than most if you get the hybrid version. In contrast, some hybrids may take several years to recoup their extra cost. For example, a hybrid version of the Honda Civic costs $2,700 more than a comparable non-hybrid Civic, and the EPA estimates that you’ll save just $450 a year by getting the hybrid.

To find out how long it will take to recover the extra cost of the hybrid you want, visit the EPA’s mpg comparison tool. But if the hybrid you want isn’t there, you can find out for yourself by comparing the price difference between the hybrid you want and the non-hybrid version of it. Then, compare the estimated annual fuel cost of each by entering the vehicles in the EPA’s fuel economy website.

Find models that are mpg standouts

If you aren’t worried about price differences and just want to start saving money on gas, focus on getting a vehicle with high fuel economy estimates. The 2026 Toyota RAV4 is a great choice for a small SUV because it comes exclusively as a hybrid and gets up to an EPA-estimated 43 mpg combined.

Want something smaller than a RAV4? The Kia Niro delivers up to 53 mpg. And what if you want the most efficient hybrid for 2026? The answer is something you’ve probably heard of: the Toyota Prius. A 2026 Prius can get up to an EPA-estimated 57 mpg combined.

Go used or certified pre-owned for a better deal

If you’re OK with a used hybrid, then you can potentially avoid the hybrid price premium entirely. A hybrid model that has more miles or is a year or two older can cost the same or less than a comparable non-hybrid. To help offset the higher mileage or age, aim for a certified pre-owned hybrid because it typically includes an additional warranty.

In some cases, you might be able to find a hybrid that’s priced the same as a non-hybrid regardless of age or mileage if it’s been on the dealership lot for an extended time. Dealerships tend to discount vehicles that aren’t selling quickly to move inventory.

New three-row hybrid SUVs can save you more

Hybrid-powered three-row SUVs are a great choice if you’ve got a large family and want to save on gas. There are also more hybrid models on the market than ever before. The all-new 2026 Hyundai Palisade Hybrid SEL, for example, can save you up to $1,100 a year versus the non-hybrid version, assuming you drive 15,000 miles a year. With savings like that, you recoup the extra cost in about two years. The Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid is another roomy three-row SUV that could pay for itself in about two years.

Edmunds says

Saving money is just one of the advantages of owning a hybrid. Many hybrids are also more powerful than non-hybrids and deliver a smoother driving experience. They also produce lower emissions and have less brake wear because of their regenerative braking system.

This story was provided to The Associated Press by the automotive website Edmunds.
Michael Cantu is a contributor at Edmunds.

—Michael Cantu of Edmunds

This week British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has been fighting for his political survival as more than 80 members of his own party have asked him to step down, and recent polls show him to be Britain’s most unpopular leader on record. Just two years ago Starmer entered Downing Steet after winning a landslide victory – where did it all go wrong?

It’s time to stop calling Gen Z the youngest generation in the workforce. Gen Alpha has entered the chat. Although the oldest Gen Alphas have only just hit their teen years, they are deeply financially motivated and ready to be put to work.

If you happen to be living with a Gen Alpha who seems strangely fixated on earning their own money—or who is obsessed with brands and products—you know that we’re raising a generation of hustlers (even if they’re just hustling us). But new data from public relations and marketing firm DKC is shedding even more light on the financial intrigue behind Gen Alpha.

The firm surveyed 1,000 parents of 8- to 15-year-olds about their children’s financial interest and conduct.

The results build on previous research, which found that Gen Alphas, while mostly still in middle school, are massively savvy financially. According to the new survey, a staggering number of Gen Alphas are already earning an income. In total, 95% are making money. But the ways they’re lining their pockets differ. 

The bank of mom and dad

For now, the earnings mostly come from their parents.

Some 85% percent receive an allowance, though most of the parents surveyed (55%) said their kids have to earn it. Good behavior and grades earn money for 67% of Gen Alphas; 78% get paid for doing chores.

However, Gen Alphas aren’t just earning inside their homes. More than half (57%) earn money through babysitting, lawn care, and other jobs, while another 14% use the internet to sell or resell items. 

The earnings are more than pocket change. On average, Gen Alphas have $52 per week of their own money, up from $45 two years ago. That comes out to a whopping $2,704 per year.

A wild time to be coming of age

The world of Gen Alpha—largely happening online—is made up of influencers doing fascinating and sometimes ridiculous things to earn a buck (or millions of them). Whether it’s platforms based on doing good deeds for others, embarrassing themselves for clicks, or taking on inventive tasks like power-washing neighbors’ trash cans, the options to start earning are regularly in their faces.

Likewise, so are brands and products, which is probably why they’re such an influential part of the household when it comes to how money is spent.

Per the new research, parents said about half of household spending decisions come from their Gen Alpha child. Some 69% of the parents surveyed said they learn about brands from their Gen Alpha kids; 71% said they’ve even changed their own consumer choices after learning about brands from their child. 

Sixty-one percent of Gen Alpha parents shop frequently with their children. But they also pay attention to what their kids are looking at online: 54% pay specific attention to influencers their child likes, and nearly half (49%) buy products from ads their child enjoys.

And what is Gen Alpha into? No big surprises here. The top categories where the big spenders are shelling out are food (75%), gaming (71%), entertainment (62%), and clothing (62%).

It’s not always easy raising a generation of kids who are already so interested in earning and spending money.

For starters, they’re constantly ambling for the newest game, pair of shoes, squishy, or viral beverage.

However, parents in DKC’s survey said that kids today aren’t just interested in making money; they’re money-smart, too. A decisive 98% of parents of Gen Alpha kids said they’re teaching their kids about budgeting, or are planning to. 

We know from DKC’s previous research that not only are Gen Alphas attentive to brands (87%), but they also care about a brand’s values (69%).

Of course, when millennial parents were kids, issues like how a company treats their employees or whether they were environmentally conscious simply weren’t on our radar. But today, everything about brands is findable online. As with most things, Gen Alphas are usually the first ones to find it.